Tuesday, April 27, 2010

Obama's Censorship Campaign


The most important tool that Obama knows he must have in place to gain power is through censorship. Censorship is critical for Obama to be able to add weight to his quest for power to "fundamentally change" America. His "public" appearances are invitation only. No opposing views are allowed during these highly orchestrated appearances. His party, the now "Socialist" Democratic Party, control the content presented to the American people through Main Stream Media. Barack Hussein Obama has personally attacked Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, Shawn Hannity and others that oppose his policies, and has encouraged others to isolate them.

All of this is new in America. A nation that is accustomed to Free Speech, is now for the first time in this nation's history, seeing the attempted radical implementation of censorship across the board. Obama will talk one talk, but walks a completely different walk. The walk down the path of V.I. Linen, Joseph Stalin, and others with the intent of forcing the taking of control of key areas of both society and the personal lives of all Americans.

Under Stalin Marxism-Leninism was upheld as a "scientific" doctrine, and thus served as the yardstick by which truth was measured. Anything which ran counter to that doctrine, including social scientific reports, fictional works, and historical accounts, were deemed "unscientific," "irrelevant," "bourgeois," or otherwise unworthy of being published. It should be noted that Marx himself opposed censorship as "bad, even when it delivers good products." Yet under Stalin, the need for extensive censorship was underscored by alleged presence of enemies of the state, whose noxious ideas had to be weeded out. It was, overall, a paternalistic rationale, in which state censors decided which material could safely be absorbed by the presumably simpler and weaker minds of the masses.

The nature of the Cold War, particularly during Stalin's time, would well justify some degree of censorship by the Soviet Socialist Government. But the excessive and arbitrary nature of censorship under Stalin reveals his pathological suspicion and distrust of the masses...


Soviet Socialists first took control of all "Health Care" and then took control of banks, the same path that Obama and the Socialist Democrats are following.

From the days of Obama's campaign to today during his "rule", control of how he is seen and what he says, even to the point of having to read directly from a teleprompter, is all a part of the selling of an ideology, over and above anything else, including the U.S. Constitution. For the purpose of all of this excessive orchestration is for one purpose, and that is Socialism first, the party second, and the “masses” are to be last.

Thursday, April 1, 2010

Constitutional Attorney Reviews The Health Care Law



A retired Constitutional lawyer has read the entire proposed healthcare bill. Read his conclusions and pass this on as you wish. This is stunning!

The Truth About the Health Care Bills
Michael Connelly, Ret. Constitutional Attorney

Well, I have done it! I have read the entire text of proposed House Bill 3200: The Affordable Health Care Choices Act of 2009. I studied it with particular emphasis from my area of expertise, constitutional law. I was frankly concerned that parts of the proposed law that were being discussed might be unconstitutional. What I found was far worse than what I had heard or expected.

To begin with, much of what has been said about the law and its implications is in fact true, despite what the Democrats and the media are saying. The law does provide for rationing of health care, particularly where senior citizens and other classes of citizens are involved, free health care for illegal immigrants, free abortion services, and probably forced participation in abortions by members of the medical profession.

The Bill will also eventually force private insurance companies out of business, and put everyone into a government run system. All decisions about personal health care will ultimately be made by federal bureaucrats, and most of them will not be health care professionals. Hospital admissions, payments to physicians, and allocations of necessary medical devices will be strictly controlled by the government.

However, as scary as all of that is, it just scratches the surface. In fact, I have concluded that this legislation really has no intention of providing affordable health care choices. Instead it is a convenient cover for the most massive transfer of power to the Executive Branch of government that has ever occurred, or even been contemplated If this law or a similar one is adopted, major portions of the Constitution of the United States will effectively have been destroyed.

The first thing to go will be the masterfully crafted balance of power between the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of the U.S. Government. The Congress will be transferring to the Obama Administration authority in a number of different areas over the lives of the American people, and the businesses they own.

The irony is that the Congress doesn't have any authority to legislate in most of those areas to begin with! I defy anyone to read the text of the U.S. Constitution and find any authority granted to the members of Congress to regulate health care.

This legislation also provides for access, by the appointees of the Obama administration, of all of your personal healthcare direct violation of the specific provisions of the 4th Amendment to the Constitution information, your personal financial information, and the information of your employer, physician, and hospital. All of this is a protecting against unreasonable searches and seizures. You can also forget about the right to privacy. That will have been legislated into oblivion regardless of what the 3rd and 4th Amendments may provide...

If you decide not to have healthcare insurance, or if you have private insurance that is not deemed acceptable to the Health Choices Administrator appointed by Obama, there will be a tax imposed on you. It is called a tax instead of a fine because of the intent to avoid application of the due process clause of the 5th Amendment. However, that doesn't work because since there is nothing in the law that allows you to contest or appeal the imposition of the tax, it is definitely depriving someone of property without the due process of law.

So, there are three of those pesky amendments that the far left hate so much, out the original ten in the Bill of Rights, that are effectively nullified by this law It doesn't stop there though.

The 9th Amendment that provides: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people;

The 10th Amendment states: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are preserved to the States respectively, or to the people. Under the provisions of this piece of Congressional handiwork neither the people nor the states are going to have any rights or powers at all in many areas that once were theirs to control.

I could write many more pages about this legislation, but I think you get the idea. This is not about health care; it is about seizing power and limiting rights... Article 6 of the Constitution requires the members of both houses of Congress to "be bound by oath or affirmation to support the Constitution." If I was a member of Congress I would not be able to vote for this legislation or anything like it, without feeling I was violating that sacred oath or affirmation. If I voted for it anyway, I would hope the American people would hold me accountable.

For those who might doubt the nature of this threat, I suggest they consult the source, the US Constitution, and Bill of Rights. There you can see exactly what we are about to have taken from us.

Michael Connelly
Retired attorney,
Constitutional Law Instructor
Carrollton , Texas