Thursday, November 20, 2008

CBS NEWS: Rick Kaplan




The following report by Lowell Ponte is of one of those in Main Stream Media who have hi-jacked major components of America's once non-partisan free press and proceeded to turn that component into a Democratic Party propaganda machine. Meet Rick Kaplan.

Keep these people in mind when the America we have known and America's people find themselves in the dark, deep abyss of despair either economically, militarily, or otherwise thanks to people like Rick Kaplan of CBS News. The Rick Kaplans of America who decided to walk away from truth and embrace anything Left Wing, lies and all, that have caused and will continue cause great damage to the American people. They very people a free press is supposed to inform with integrity, not with blind allegiance to one and only one ideology.


By: Lowell Ponte
Friday, March 9, 2007


CBS News quietly announced this week that it is hiring Rick Kaplan as new executive producer of the "CBS Evening News" to rescue ratings that have been sinking like a stone since last September when Katie Couric became its left-leaning anchor.

Kaplan, 59, who left MSNBC last June after two-and-a-half years of failure at NBC's cable news network, is recognized by many critics as a poster boy for liberal media bias.

Born in Chicago, Kaplan grew up a left-liberal Democrat. "He envisioned a life of political activism," wrote David Margolick in a January 1998 Vanity Fair profile, "and joined the 1968 presidential campaign of Sen. Eugene McCarthy as an advance man. A week later, when Bobby Kennedy won the California primary, Kaplan prepared to switch sides, and headed to Kennedy's hotel to meet him. He ended up that night alone on a Santa Monica beach, watching the waves, listening to radio reports about Kennedy's slow death. He contemplated a radically altered future outside politics."

Turning to broadcast journalism, Rick Kaplan was a producer for Walter Cronkite in 1977 when Susan Thomases introduced him to the obscure attorney general of Arkansas named Bill Clinton.

"Both gregarious, both personable, both deeply interested in politics, both news junkies, both charmers, both voracious eaters (their first encounter, appropriately enough, was in a restaurant), they hit it off instantly," wrote Margolick. "'I just remember he was a terrific guy,' Kaplan said. ‘Fun.'"

"If anything," wrote Margolick, "Kaplan was at least as close to Hillary, who shares his Chicago roots; he even hired her to work on coverage of the 1980 Democratic convention.

During the 1980s Kaplan helped talk Bill Clinton out of giving up politics to take a million-dollar job on Wall Street. After Clinton's much-ridiculed speech at the 1988 Democratic convention in Atlanta, writes Margolick, "it was Kaplan's shoulder Clinton cried on, over Chinese takeout . . ." and Kaplan who persuaded Clinton that his political career was not over.

After a stint during the 1980s as executive producer of ABC's "Nightline," Kaplan was promoted to executive producer of ABC's "PrimeTime Live." In 1992 he dispatched reporters to work undercover as employees at the supermarket chain Food Lion, then a target of the United Food and Commercial Workers Union (UFCW) trying to put the company out of business. The ABC reporters got Food Lion jobs by using credentials and references ABC faked with the help of the UFCW.

The resulting expose, aired by ABC around election time that year, depicted Food Lion as an unethical seller of outdated and contaminated foods. Food Lion sued, and a jury that saw the 45 hours of video from which Kaplan and ABC distilled a 10-minute hit piece awarded Food Lion $5.5 million in punitive damages for fraud committed by Capital Cities-ABC against the company.

Such a judgement is extremely rare because it requires clear evidence not only of wrong and false information but also of malice, a calculated and knowing use of falsehood by journalists to cause damage to an innocent party. These damages were greatly reduced by subsequent liberal judges, and a jury fine of $35,000 against Kaplan himself was overturned by a judge.

What the unaired videotape revealed was that in several instances the wrongdoing ascribed to Food Lion was actually committed by or at the direction of these ABC producer fake employees. In one instance, when a genuine Food Lion employee noticed and cleaned a dirty meat slicer that ABC was preparing to film as evidence, one of the ABC producers could be heard "muttering obscenities."

It was evident that ABC was covering the story with a pro-union, anti-company agenda and was stacking the deck to produce the propaganda it wanted to air. The man in charge of this leftist smear piece was the executive producer, Rick Kaplan.


By 1992 Kaplan had left any pretense of journalistic ethics or fairness behind. "Kaplan," wrote Tim Graham of the Media Research Center, "has been the prime example of a TV news producer who did not just blur, but demolished the wall between reporting on liberal politicians and openly helping them."

With Clinton at risk of extinction in the 1992 New Hampshire primary, Kaplan reportedly influenced ABC News to delay reporting for three crucial days its discovery of the 1969 Clinton letter to Col. Eugene Holmes.

This is the notorious letter, as described by Accuracy in Media, in which "Clinton confessed to having tricked Col. Holmes, getting him to violate federal law to get him ROTC deferment" and in which Clinton "said he loathed the military." The delay gave Clinton time to prepare damage control to blunt the letter's impact.

While executive producer of ABC's "PrimeTime Live," Kaplan in 1992 advised Clinton how to deal with the Gennifer Flowers affair issue, recommended that the Clintons appear on rival CBS program "60 Minutes," and advised the Clintons on how to handle that orchestrated interview.

In his 1994 book, "Strange Bedfellows," a study of press coverage of the 1992 campaign, Los Angeles Times reporter Tom Rosentiel described, in Margolick's words, "a frantic evening when Clinton called Kaplan repeatedly, baring his soul and seeking strategic advice."

"Weeks later," reported Graham, "when Clinton's campaign struggled in the New York primary, Kaplan rode to the rescue again, getting Clinton booked on the Don Imus radio show. Kaplan not only arranged the interview, he prepared him for it — and ABC cameras taped both ends of the conversation for airing on ‘Nightline.' Later, Kaplan did not deny a Spy magazine report that he boasted of attending Clinton campaign staff meetings and helped set up the campaign's press office."

On the eve of the 1992 election, ABC reporter Sam Donaldson had taped interviews with both President George H.W. Bush and Clinton. Kaplan ordered Donaldson to do a tag line to his Clinton interview "to make it clear that you don't hate Clinton." This tag, of course, weakened Donaldson's credibility and the power of his questions, leaving an impression that the reporter was somehow biased and that the interview therefore should be taken with a grain of salt.

The effect was to tilt the two interviews more in Clinton's favor.

Kaplan "played golf with Bill shortly before the inauguration," according to the liberal magazine the New Republic, "and watched movies with both Clintons at the governor's mansion."

In 1993 Kaplan spent the first of his nights in the Lincoln Bedroom in the Clinton White House. He was among those thus rewarded for services to the Clintons at least as valuable as the $100,000 they would charge mere political donors for a single night's stay in this public property.

In late October 1994, "Kaplan killed [ABC reporter] Jim Wooten's exclusive interview with an Arkansas state trooper who claimed a Clinton aide had tried to muzzle him," reported Margolick. "After that, Wooten refused to do any more pieces on Whitewater." Another "ABC News" producer told Margolick that "the bar kept getting higher" for such investigations into Clinton dealings with Whitewater.

By 1997, after Kaplan moved to Cable News Network as one of its chieftains, with evidence of campaign fund-raising improprieties threatening to submerge Clinton, CNN unleashed a Kaplan-produced special. "U.S. News & World Report" found that Kaplan had ordered CNN reporters to "limit the use of the word ‘scandal' in reporting on Clinton's campaign fund raising." The message to CNN reporters was clear: Go easy on the boss's friends in the White House.

As the Monica Lewinsky scandal broke in 1998, wrote Graham, "Kaplan leapt into action at CNN with two-hour specials attacking any and all Clinton critics. The programs included ‘Media Madness,' which asked ‘What the hell are you people doing' probing Bill Clinton's sex life?; and ‘Investigating the Investigator,' which described Ken Starr as ‘suspect' over his ‘religious and Republican roots.' In May, Kaplan devoted an hour to demonizing Rep. Dan Burton [a Republican], who was compared by reporter Bruce Morton to English despot Oliver Cromwell."

Kaplan saw to it that CNN gave softball coverage to the Clintons and threw hardballs at their enemies. Under his watch, CNN came to be known as the Clinton News Network for its pro-Bill and Hill bias. According to Bill O'Reilly of rival Fox News Channel, "financial reporter Lou Dobbs quit CNN because Kaplan was cutting into ‘Moneyline' to give Mr. Clinton some marginal coverage."

CNN also came to be called the "Castro News Network" for its coverage unwaveringly favorable to the Cuban dictator. Kaplan and Castro have been good friends since at least 1978, Margolick reported, and during a Castro United Nations visit to New York while they were dining together, Kaplan invited Castro to come with him to a private dinner with President Clinton, Deputy White House Chief of Staff Harold Ickes, and Susan Thomases. "Castro paused, for what seemed like an hour, before declining," wrote Margolick. "He didn't want to embarrass Clinton, he explained."

In 1998 CNN President Kaplan also oversaw production of the first documentary for his new show "NewsStand." The documentary called "Tailwind," narrated by hyper-leftist journalist Peter Arnett, alleged that during the Vietnam War the United States had used poison gas against women and children in Laos. Challenged for proof by other journalists and the Pentagon, CNN's documentary fell apart like the tissue of lies it was. But that did not stop its use around the world as a tool of Marxist anti-American propaganda.

Kaplan's politicizing of the news did not end with the Clintons. "The November 20, 2000, Newsweek reported Kaplan had helped Al Gore prepare for a debate against Bill Bradley," wrote Graham. "At a rehearsal for a California debate on March 1, Kaplan joked, ‘Let's do the debate now.'" But as Graham notes, Kaplan "was still CNN president in March," while acting openly as a Gore partisan and enabler.

"I keep looking for what I should be ashamed of, long and hard," Kaplan told Margolick of those who question his Clinton sycophancy and lack of journalistic distance from those he covers, "and I just can't find anything."

Kaplan moved on to head MSNBC, which he reshaped into a network that, according to Fox News Channel's Bill O'Reilly, slants its news and commentary in a partisan, liberal Democratic Party way.

Critics have a similar view of how Katie Couric covers news and politics. Couric's late sister Emily was a left-liberal Virginia state senator and chair of the state's Democratic Party.

Couric and Kaplan both have giant egos, but as ideological soul mates they could be happy together. Will viewers want to see even more leftist distortion of the nightly news through a single, left CBS eye?

Thursday, November 13, 2008

Freedom of the Press

In a democratic nation, the importance of a free press assumed that such a press would be fair, balanced and focused on all aspects of all parties and issues within that society or nation.

Since the founding of this nation, no one ever expected that the press, even in a supposedly free and open society could be taken over so completely and re-tooled to become the propaganda machine of only one facet of our society. History will show that this point was reached in America in the year 2008.

Television, print media, a huge section of radio, the entertainment industry such as movie and music segments have almost completely dedicated all their resources to promoting a specific political doctrine. Therefore, instead of being a free press, they have become a propaganda machine for that specific doctrine, and as such supports that doctrine completely regardless of what the cost to our society will be. This propaganda machine supportive of one and only one philosophy will cover up mistakes made by those who are in office who govern according to the precepts of that particular political doctrine.

The press will now cover for those who share that doctrine and who wish to run for office. The press works to hide characteristics and virtues of that person that if viewed from a full range of perspectives regarding that virtue or flaw would appear to blatantly disqualify those individuals from office. This propaganda machine will go to this extreme especially for those they see as having strong personalities and traits that could enhance the specific doctrine the press supports in the eyes of the public.

We are not talking about possible situations here, we are talking about what has happened in the elections of 2008. And not what occured only in the Presidential election but to Congressional elections as well. This is not an apparition, it is now reality.

Even though the above actions are done in order to support and shore up that particular political philosophy, society overall may be damaged and even destroyed, including the press itself, from forces within or from forces outside America.

Large segments of people in that nation, facing the destruction of their nation overall and finding themselves either suddenly or slowly being burdened beyond their means in trying to maintain a good quality of life will ask "What happened". "What happened" was that the press only presented a biased view and never published views and critiques from ALL perspectives that could have exposed such dangers lurking on the horizon, because those perspectives were not the perspective of the ideology they supported.

If circumstances become dire, people may then ask "Who can help us now" when they find themselves in danger of losing property they spent a lifetime working to acquire, "for the good of others" per such political ideology. They may find themselves in a situation where their loved ones or they themselves face dangers such as what we saw on September 11, 2001, where thousands died in an attack on America, because the media refused to cover specific faults of the political party representative of its ideology sufficiently enough for such dangers to mature and become real.

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Welcome to the Austin Tea Party


Tell your friends and fellow patriots of this site and let them feel free to express their hopes and dreams for keeping America strong through the power of knowledge and communication. The knowledge of how to make an impact against a new Washington D.C. that is bent on changing America through high taxation, government regulation and the taking apart of the liberties, freedoms and possessions of a blessed people, the American people.